<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The New Space &#187; birth center</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mothering.com/thenewspace/tag/birth-center/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mothering.com/thenewspace</link>
	<description>opening a birth center in NYC in 2011</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:15:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Two is a coincidence, three is a trend&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://mothering.com/thenewspace/insurance/two-is-a-coincidence-three-is-a-trend</link>
		<comments>http://mothering.com/thenewspace/insurance/two-is-a-coincidence-three-is-a-trend#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homebirth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-insured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mothering.com/thenewspace/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the phone rings, it&#8217;s usually a regular business call.  Unless it&#8217;s the last week of the month, when we start getting incessant calls from the bar association, making sure, for the umpteenth time, that I am properly listed in the directory (and no, I don&#8217;t want to buy a copy).  But these days, we&#8217;ve been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the phone rings, it&#8217;s usually a regular business call.  Unless it&#8217;s the last week of the month, when we start getting incessant calls from the bar association, making sure, for the umpteenth time, that I am properly listed in the directory (and no, I don&#8217;t want to buy a copy).  But these days, we&#8217;ve been hearing from more and more pregnant women, calling because maybe, just maybe, we&#8217;re actually open, and if not, could someone please help with her insurance company?</p>
<p>We&#8217;re used to the &#8220;can you recommend an XYZ provider in Brooklyn&#8221; calls &#8211; in fact, we really enjoy being helpful in such a immediate, one-on-one way.  In a world of phone trees, we&#8217;re happy to be the friendly voice.  But, these insurance calls are coming more frequently, and one issue has risen to the top:</p>
<p>In the last few weeks we&#8217;ve gotten a number of calls from women who are covered by self-insured health insurance policies (often multi-national corporations or unions).  And many of these policies exclude out-of-hospital birth, going so far as to claim, in once instance, that it was an &#8220;experimental&#8221; procedure.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how else to put this, except that these exclusions just make no sense.  Health and financial outcomes are better when low-risk birth is moved out of a hospital setting.  These company policies are costing &#8211; you guessed it &#8211; the companies.  These policies are not driven by the bottom line or concern for what&#8217;s best for mom and baby.  </p>
<p>Coincidence or trend?  We&#8217;re still collecting information, but if you have a story about a <strong>self-insured policy</strong> issuing a denial for out-of-hospital birth (birth center or homebirth) we&#8217;d love to hear from you.  We&#8217;re working on the best strategy to deal with the issue, and will keep everyone updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mothering.com/thenewspace/insurance/two-is-a-coincidence-three-is-a-trend/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

