Forgot Password?

Peggy O'Mara

A Quiet Place

The Autism Epidemic

April 2nd, 2012

Photo of Timmy and Emmy Conroy of Boulder, Colorado by Julia Vandenoever

Just last week, the CDC announced a new estimate of the number of children identified with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): 1 in 88. This is up from the CDC’s 2007 estimate of 1 in 150. According to the CDC, the estimated prevalence of ASDs increased 78% from 2002 to 2008.

Five times as many boys as girls are diagnosed with ASD: 1 in 54 for boys; 1 in 252 for girls. According to Mark Blaxill of Safe Minds, the rate of ASD in some states is 1 in 50. Utah, for example has a rate of 1 in 47; New Jersey’s rate is 1 in 49. Autism affects over 100,000 families.

At a press conference on World Autism Awareness Day, Blaxill called for: real community participation; an investigation by the Government Accounting Office (GAO); Congressional hearings; and telling the truth about vaccines and autism.

Vaccines and Autism. While the possible association between childhood vaccines and autism has been categorically denied by many, a 2011 study in the Pace Environmental Law Review identified 83 cases of autism associated with childhood vaccine injury that have been compensated for through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP). 

Safe Minds,  the non-profit organization founded by parents of autistic children, hopes “to restore health and protect future generations by eradicating the devastation of autism and associated health disorders induced by mercury and other man made toxicants, and to eliminate exposure to mercury in medical products, vaccines, and in the environment.” Their outstanding “white paper,” The Autism Crisis — April 2012 is full of information that they encourage be shared with others:

Call it an Epidemic. The prevalence of autism is rising at about 12% a year. If we don’t find a cause in the next five years, 80,000 children a year will be diagnosed with autism. Safe Minds asks, “Can anyone with a conscience claim this isn’t an epidemic?”

Allocate more money for Autism research and services. Only $230 million is allocated per year for  the 730,000 people with autism in the US. The National Institutes of Health (NIH), for example, allocates $169 million a year for autism (45,454 babies a year); $170 million for pediatric cancer (800 US babies a year); $228 million for pediatric AIDS (13,333 babies a year).

Fund Environmental Research. The largest twin study to date found that autism risk is 55 to 58% environmental and only 37 to 38% genetic. Despite this finding, funding for genetic causation research outweighed funding for environmental causation research approximately six to one in 2009. Safe Minds calls for research into populations that may be more susceptible to vaccine injury.

Compare Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Children. The August 2011 Institute of Medicine report on Vaccine Adverse Effects investigated 158 potential adverse outcomes from vaccines. Of these, 135, or 85%, were found to have inadequate research to accept or reject a causal association. Of the 23 outcomes where the research was deemed adequate, 18, or 78%, were found supportive of harm. Research was only adequate to clear five of the 158 outcomes from vaccine safety concerns.

It is time for a large trial of vaccinated and unvaccinated children to see if there are higher autism rates among vaccinated children than among those who have never been vaccinated.

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

[ 5 comments ]

Voluntary Vaccines in Japan

February 5th, 2010

Peter Doshi, MA, a doctoral candidate at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and currently a Visiting Researcher with the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Tokyo, spoke at the National Vaccine Information Center conference on the difference between the childhood vaccine programs in the US and Japan.

Japan, a country of 130 million people with low infant mortality and high life expectancy, has had a completely voluntary vaccination system since 1994. No system exists to check vaccine status in schools in Japan. Recommended vaccines are free and one must pay out of pocket for elective vaccines. Vaccination coverage rates are high, according to Doshi, because the Japanese public has high trust in authority and high expectations for vaccine safety. The Japanese culture values quality control and product excellence.

During the first six months of life, the Japanese child receives only two vaccines: Polio (OPV) and BCG, while the US child receives multiple doses of eight or nine vaccines. During the first year of life, the Japanese child receives 14 doses of vaccines while the US child receives 33 doses. And, in the first two years of life if all recommended vaccines are administered, the Japanese child receives 17 doses of seven vaccines and the US child receives 23 doses of 10 vaccines.

In Japan, generally only one injection is given at a time. Contrast this to the US in which monovalent (single dose) vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella are not even available. According to the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), there is no medical reason to administer the measles, mumps and rubella antigens separately and ACIP guidelines do not support their use. Based on this input and on manufacturing constraints, Merck stopped making these three monovalent vaccines in 2008 despite strong demand from parents.

In Japan, inactivated vaccines are administered six days apart and live vaccines 27 days apart. In contrast, the CDC recommends combining vaccines and states that no time is needed between them.

Japanese health officials take the possibility of vaccine reactions seriously. They ask all parents to fill out a detailed immunization questionnaire and to record any possible vaccine reactions in the Mother-Child Handbook that the government provides. Parents must read the handbook and give consent before their child receives vaccines. They are directed to take their child’s temperature before a vaccination is administered, as Japanese health officials believe that vaccinations may worsen an already sick child. The handbook also asks that parents observe their children’s behavior for 30 minutes following vaccination.

In Japan, vaccinations are not given to children if they have fever or an acute illness or have shown any abnormal symptoms following a previous dose of a vaccine. In contrast, the CDC says, “A mild illness or fever is usually not a reason to delay an immunization.”

What led to the voluntary system in Japan? The Japanese found that mandatory vaccinations did not guarantee compliance and saw adverse events associated with vaccines as a social problem. In 1962 childhood vaccines first became mandatory in Japan and by 1974 Japanese children were required to receive four vaccines. When there were problems with vaccines, the government took action. In 1975, after two successive deaths following the whole cell pertussis vaccine, the vaccine was temporarily suspended. When the vaccine was resumed it was only recommended for those over two years of age and by 1981, a new vaccine, the acellular pertussis vaccine was developed and introduced in Japan. Tragically, the acellular pertussis vaccine was not licensed in the US until 1991.

In 1989, when the MMR vaccine was causing three cases of aseptic meningitis for every 1000 vaccines, the vaccine was taken off the market and reformulated. Subsequent vaccines only included measles and rubella, not mumps. In 1987 the Japanese law was relaxed and the detailed immunization questionnaire for parents was begun. In 1994 mandatory mass vaccines in Japan ended. Perhaps because of the mutual trust inherent in the Japanese system, 2006 showed high rates of vaccine compliance for the first dose: 98% were vaccinated with the DPT vaccine; 97% with polio; 97% with measles, and 100% with rubella.

Tags: , , , ,

[ 10 comments ]

Parents Will Fund The Research

October 4th, 2009

Well, the vaccine conference is over, at least for me. There is one last panel tonight on vaccines and political action, but it’s time for me to rest and to catch you up on this amazing event. I had originally intended to blog everyday, but the conference schedule has literally been non-stop and this is the first chance I’ve had to organize my thoughts.

The conference presentations were uniformly excellent, the material diverse and far reaching and the attendees inspired and activated. There is no doubt in my mind that we have reached a critical mass. It is just a matter of time before we resuscitate the informed consent doctrine in the US. Perhaps it is the fear of mandatory vaccines for swine flu that finally will tip the point.

In the spirit of The Seven Traits of Highly Effective People, I want to “start with the end in sight.” I will tell you about the end of the conference and then go back to the beginning. Over the next two weeks, I will blog about what I’ve learned from the sessions.

Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), made her closing remarks joyfully today. Just yesterday, Dawn Richardson, president of Parents Requesting Open Vaccine Education (PROVE), suggested that since the government was unwilling to fund research into comparing health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated children, we do it ourselves.

Barbara offered that NVIC would immediately begin to take donations to fund such a scientific study, to be conducted by independent, credentialed researchers and published in an important medical journal. In just the last 24 hours of this conference, NVIC has raised $110,000 for this study and will issue a press release regarding it tomorrow, Monday 5 October 2009. This is an historic moment.

I would suggest that you go immediately to the NVIC website and sign up for their newsletter so that you can receive the press release. While you’re at it, make a donation to NVIC. Family membership is just $25. Their mostly volunteer staff has been doing so much for all of us since 1982 and they operate on a budget of less than $300,000 a year. Barbara said that if they had more funding for the organization, they could:
Mount a national advertising campaign.
Offer a 24 hour a day national vaccine reaction reporting hotline.
Create statewide legal and medical networks.
Coordinate state leaders working for state exemptions.

Dawn Richardson from Texas, who suggested that parents do the study, has developed model state language for a medical exemption. She did a session Thursday night on “State Organizing To Get & Protect Vaccine Choices” and I’ve asked her to write an article for us on this topic. Look for it in early 2010. More tomorrow.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

[ 2 comments ]

At the Vaccine Conference

October 1st, 2009

I’m in Reston, Virginia right now, here to attend the 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination put on by the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC). The conference is being held from Thursday, October 1st through Sunday, October 4th, 2009. Monday, October 5th, is a group lobbying day on Capitol Hill. The day includes a congressional briefing on the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) and time for conference participants to visit their own state legislators to discuss vaccine safety issues.

I always love visiting the DC area, probably because I’ve come here mostly to attend vaccine conferences or congressional hearings on vaccines. I knew that the conference would give me the impetus I wanted to get my blog started because I’m eager to share all of the fabulous information I will be learning during the next three days. It will also be an opportunity for me to solicit great articles for 2010.

I intend to keep you posted on the exciting presentations from the conference. I’m particularly looking forward to hearing George Annas on “Informed Consent,” Vicky Debold on “Vaccinated and Unvaccinated: Measuring Outcomes” and Andy Wakefield on “Vaccines and Inflammation.” I’ll especially watch out for any information to help you quell the swine flu hysteria.

I’ll be giving the opening speech Friday morning on “The New Health Journalism: Challenging the Status Quo” and will post my talk online later that day.

On Friday evening, I’ll be the moderator for the “Mother & Child Panel” with Amy Lansky, Stephen Marini and Jeanne Ohm. What a lineup! On Saturday, I have the honor to moderate Bob Sears, who will talk on “The Alternative Vaccine Schedule’ and Larry Palevsky on “Getting Sick to Stay Well.” And Sunday, I’ll be thrilled to moderate Joe Mercola’s talk, “Take Control of Your Health.” I can’t wait to meet him.

And, Saturday night, I will receive the Courage in Journalism award from NVIC. I cried when I read Barbara Loe Fisher’s email letting me know. She wrote, “I would like to present you with the NVIC’s Courage in Journalism award in recognition of your many years of leadership in framing the paradigm shift that is occurring in child health toward achieving wellness without constant use of multiple vaccines or drugs.”

More on all this soon. Stay tuned.

Tags: , , ,

[ 23 comments ]


.


Ad Slot: Top Box

    Welcome to A Quiet Place

    Mothering's long-time editor and publisher, Peggy O'Mara, shares observations and insights about overcoming parenting obstacles, appreciating unacknowledged epiphanies, and taking care of yourself. Also, great food ideas and recipes, as well as beautiful home and garden tips.

Search








Bottom Box